Cellphone Location Data and Privacy in Fresno

January 16, 2016
GPS location searches are illegal in many cases, but you need a criminal lawyer in Fresno.

Share Now

Contact Us Today

Contact our skilled criminal defense lawyer to protect your rights and receive the dedicated representation your case deserves.

Reach out to our experienced traffic ticket defense lawyer today to protect your driving record and defend against your traffic citation.

Contact our experienced DUI defense attorney today to safeguard your rights and build a strong defense against DUI charges.

If you are charged with a crime or want your criminal record cleared, contact our defense lawyer to discuss your case.

Schedule a Free Consultation

Recently the U.S. Supreme Court had the opportunity to decide on whether police need to obtain a search warrant to examine cellphone location information held by wireless carriers.  However, the court declined to answer the question, rising the concern of how well wireless carriers protect privacy.

Why wasn’t a search warrant needed?

The United States had obtained a court order asking the wireless carrier to disclose location data from a suspect’s cellphone, without first obtaining a warrant.   They relied on a provision of the 1987 Federal Stored Communications Act, stating probable cause is not needed to obtain customer records.

In addition, the court recognized in Smith v. Maryland that a cellphone user had no reasonable expectation of privacy when dialing numbers.  Since the wireless carrier maintains them for their record, the user knowingly exposes this information regardless.

Should a search warrant be required anyway?

Given the progression of technology in the area of mobile devices since 1987, they have become more than just a device used for communication purposes.  In this day in age, cellphones contain a wealth data that could be private to the user.

Taking this progression into consideration, privacy should be assumed by the user.  A person cannot use the device without first having to share their information with the wireless carrier.  

This inherent problem should not be turned into a dilemma of whether or not to use a cellphone.  Thus, the burden to maintain a certain level of privacy should be on the carrier and not the user.

Protection under the Constitution.

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution citizens enjoy the protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.  The user may voluntary disclose this information, but privacy should still be maintained.  Wireless users should not have to fear their private information could be released when using their own property.

Privacy concerns still remain.

The court may have had their motives for declining the case, but privacy concerns still remain.  Mobile devices have advanced over the years, and the law should allow for users to maintain privacy in their effects. Therefore, wireless carriers should have a higher level of privacy when releasing customer data.

Criminal Case Problems? Call today!

If you have a matter regarding a search and seizure violation of your cell phone, please do not hesitate to contact us to discuss your case.  

Related Posts

Take a deeper Dive

Explore Our Categories

a books on shelves in a room

Schedule Your Free Consultation

At the Law Offices of Tina M. Barberi, PC, we are dedicated in providing you a strong defense in your case. Our proactive approach ensures personalized and effective legal solutions.